[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 11, Issue 2 (6-2022) ::
MEO 2022, 11(2): 157-185 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Precedents and Consequences of Accepting E-Learning in Students' Educational and Research Goals
Mohammad Razzaghi *, Hasan Ghalavandi, Mohammad Hasani
Ph. D Student in Educational Administration, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
Abstract:   (966 Views)
The aim of this study was to investigate the antecedents and consequences of accepting e-learning in students. This research is applied in terms of purpose and nature and in terms of data collection is a descriptive correlation based on structural equation modeling. The statistical population of the study consisted of all undergraduate students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in the number of 4064 people who were selected as a sample through Krejcie and Morgan table, 351 people through proportional stratified random sampling method. To measure the research variables, questionnaires of students' characteristics, students' attitudes toward e-learning, system quality, content quality, teachers' characteristics, knowledge management, e-learning acceptance, behavioral intention and actual use of e-learning system were used. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by logical (formal and content) and structural (confirmatory factor analysis) validity methods and the reliability by Cronbach's alpha were estimated. The data analysis method was performed at two levels of descriptive and inferential (structural equation model) which was implemented through SPSS 24 and Lisrel 8.8 software. Based on the research results, students 'characteristics, students' attitudes toward e-learning, system quality, content quality, faculty characteristics and knowledge management as a precursor and behavioral intention and actual use of e-learning system as a consequence of accepting e-learning Is an emphasis. The highest correlation coefficient was observed between system quality and e-learning acceptance (ß= 0.91) and the lowest correlation between content quality and e-learning acceptance (ß = 0.42). Also, the highest correlation coefficient was observed for e-learning acceptance consequences. Behavioral intention (ß= 0.72) was observed between e-learning acceptance and possible outcome. According to the obtained results, it can be said that any increase in the variables of student characteristics, students' attitudes toward e-learning, system quality, content quality, faculty characteristics and knowledge management as antecedents with increasing In students' e-learning acceptance and any increase in the e-learning acceptance variable will be accompanied by an increase in the amount of behavioral intention and actual use of the e-learning system as consequences. Therefore, it seems necessary to pay attention to the antecedents and consequences of accepting e-learning when launching and using the e-learning system.
 
Keywords: Antecedents, consequences, acceptance of e-learning, educational and research goals, medical students.
Full-Text [PDF 1916 kb]   (139 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: managing education in higher education
Received: 2021/11/16 | Accepted: 2022/05/5 | Published: 2022/07/1
References
1.  Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams, G. (2018). A research synthesis of critical success factors of e-learning: A model development. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(1), 25-39. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3061.1777. [In Persian].
2.  Adeyemi, T. O., & Olaleye, F. O. (2010). Information communication and Technology (ICT) for the effective management of secondary school for sustainable development in Ekiti state, Nigeria American-Eurasian. Journal of Science Research, 5(2), 106-113.
3.  Ajam, A., Badnava, S., Sabery, R., & Zabihi Hesary, N. (2017). Anticipation of e-learning acceptance through nursing Students enthusiasm scale at Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2015. The Journal of Medical Education and Development, 11(4), 330-339. [In Persian]. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.8.4.11]
4.  Akbar, F. (2013). What affects students' acceptance and use of technology? Senior Honors Thesis, Information Systems, Dietrich College, Carnegie Mellon University.
5.  Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: [DOI:10.1037/t74215-000]
6. An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86.
7.  Al- Ammari, J., & Hamad, S. (2008). Factors influencing the adaption of e-learning at UOB. Proc. of the 2nd International Conference and Exhibition for Zain E-learning Center, University of Bahrain, Bahrain.
8.  Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing
9. perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers and Education, 127, 1-12.
10.  Alipour, N., Noroozi, D., & Nourian, M. (2021). Designing a model of components affecting the quality of e-learning environments. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(3), 503-518. doi: 10.22061/tej.2021.7167.2505. [In Persian].
11.  Bindhu, A., & Manohar, H. M. (2015). Review on E-Learning Effectiveness Models. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications, 15 (1), 83-88.
12.  Bora, J., & Ahmed, M. (2013). E-Learning using Cloud Computing. International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering, 1(2), 9-12.
13.  Brindley, J. E. (2014). Learner support in online distance education: essential and evolving. In O. Zawacki- Richter & T. Anderson (eds.), online distance education. Towards a research agenda, (287-310). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
14.  Chang, V. (2016). Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 467-485. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.007]
15.  Chen, F. S., Liao, C. W., & Chen, T. H. (2010). Notice of Retraction Adult Distance Education Students' Perspective on Critical Success Factors of e-Learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Technology and Training (ETT 2009) (ETT) Sanya. [DOI:10.1109/ETT.2009.85]
16.  Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A., Chen, N., & Spector, J. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000-2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001]
17.  Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., DiFelice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success
18. determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273-290.
19.  Elahiyan Firouz, S., & Khazaei, K. (2012). The Rate of Using Components of standards in Designing Electronic Courses in Educational Contents of State-Virtual Universities in Iran. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2(2), 141-162. [In Persian].
20.  Farazkish, M., & Montazer, G. (2020). Assessment of students' perceptual readiness for e-learning in Iranian Universities. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(1), 101-117. doi: 10.22061/tej.2020.6051.2324. [In Persian].
21.  Farzin Yazdi, M., & Hazeri, A. (2015). Study on Knowledge and Information Science Students Attitudes toward E-Learning (Case Study: Yazd University). Teaching and Learning Research, 12(1), 235-248. doi: 10.22070/2.6.235. [In Persian].
22.  Ghanbri, S., Rezghishirsavar, H., Ziyaeei, M., & Mosleh, M. (2019). Presentation an E-Learning assessment Model - Islamic Azad Univesity E-Campus. Educational Administration Research, 11(41), 75-100. [In Persian].
23.  Ghalyan, S., & Zalpour, A. (2019). Identifying Factors of Success in E-Learning Case Study: Physical Education Students at Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Educational Development of Judishapur, 10(2), 135-143. doi: 10.22118/edc.2019.90842. [In Persian].
24.  Halili, S. H., & Sulaiman, H. (2018). Factors influencing the rural students' acceptance of using ICT for educational purposes. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 40(3), 1-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.022]
25.  Hassani Jafari, F., & Abbasi, A. (2020). Comparing e-learning in self-regulatory learning strategy and educational motivation. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(1), 51-60. doi: 10.22061/jte.2019.4268.2064. [In Persian].
26.  Hasanzade, A., karimzadegan moghadam, D., & motaghian, H. (2013). Assessing the Factors Influencing University Instructors Adoption of Web-Based Learning Systems Using an Integrated Model. Management Research in Iran, 17(1), 41-72. [In Persian].
27.  Hedayati k, A., Ghasemzadeh, A., & Maleki, S. (2019). The Amount of Students' Preparation and Professors' Attitude towards E-learning System Implementation. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 4(4), 157-181. doi: 10.22091/stim.2019.3790.1275. [In Persian].
28.  Hew, K. F., Hu, X., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with
29. MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis
30. approach. Computers and Education, 145, 103724.
31.  Hew, T. S., & Kadir, S. L. S. A. (2016). Predicting instructional effectiveness of cloudbased virtual learning environment. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(8), 1557-1584. [DOI:10.1108/IMDS-11-2015-0475]
32.  Jafarpoor, M. (2011). Study and identification of mobile commerce expansion obstacles in Iran. IT Management Studies, 1(1), 91-121. [In Persian].
33.  Khodadad Hoseiny, S. H., Noori, A., Zabihi, M. R. (2013). E-learning acceptance in higher education: Application of flow theory, technology acceptance model & e-service quality. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(1), 111-136. [In Persian].
34.  Khorasani, A., Abdolmaleki, J., & Zahedi, H. (2012). Factors Affecting E-Learning Acceptance among Students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences Based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(6), 664-673. [In Persian].
35.  Lawson, S. (2003). Examining the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Knowledg Management. Doctoral Dissertatation, Nava Southeastern University, Proquest.
36.  Luka, I. (2018). Summative evaluation of online language learning course efficiency for [DOI:10.1108/QAE-04-2018-0051]
37. students studying tourism and hospitality management. Quality Assurance in
38. Education, 26(4), 446-465.
39.  Makkizadeh, F., Farajpahlou, A., Osareh, F., & Sheniyailagh, M. (2012). Identification of Factors Affecting Academic Users' Acceptance of Web-Based Databases: A Grounded-Theory Approach. Journal of Academic librarianship and Information Research, 46(1), 59-81. doi: 10.22059/jlib.2012.28776. [In Persian].
40.  Mohammadian, S. (2019). Causal model of acceptance and use of information and communication technology of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences students based on the integrated theory of acceptance and use of technology. Master Thesis, Azerbaijan Shahid Madani University. [In Persian].
41.  Mohammadian, S., Ghasemzadeh Alishahi, A., & Rafiei, M. (2020). Causal Model of Acceptance and Use of Information and Communication Technology by Students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Educational and Research Purposes Based on the UTAUT Model. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and management, 36(2), 391-418. [In Persian].
42.  Mojaddam, K., Nadaf, M., & Mohammadi, S. (2019). Examining Factors affecting Consumer Use Behavior from Online Shopping Technology based on the Unified ‎Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology2 (UTAUT2)‎ Case Study: Digikala Customers in Khuzestan Province. New Marketing Research Journal, 9(4), 115-136. doi: 10.22108/nmrj.2020.118038.1800. [In Persian].
43.  Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors' intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 171-250. [DOI:10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687]
44.  Narenjithani, F., pourkarimi, J., & Hejazi, S. (2021). Identifying the components of e-learning system at University of Tehran. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(2), 321-337. doi: 10.22061/tej.2020.6130.2336. [In Persian].
45.  Ojaghi, N., Esmaeili, Z., Sarmadi, M., & Saeidipour, B. (2019). Explaining student retention based on psychological characteristics, previous experiences, academic background, management and computer skills in the e-learning environment. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(3), 618-625. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3294.1840. [In Persian].
46.  Ommati, E., & Alipour, A. (2016). Important elements in the design of user interface, usability and technical issues of databases during the years 2014 -2016. Journal of Modern Medical Information Scince, 2(2), 59-72. [In Persian].
47.  Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Nadlifatin, R. (2019). Understanding the Generation Z Behavior on D-Learning: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, (iJET), 14(5), 20-33. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9993]
48.  Pontiggia, A., & Virili, F. (2010). Network effects in technology acceptance: Laboratory experimental evidence. International Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 68-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.001]
49.  Poortavakoli, A., Alinejad, M., & Daneshmand, B. (2020). Designing a pattern for e-content development based on the factors affecting satisfaction in e-learning. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 15(1), 119-138. doi: 10.22061/tej.2020.4490.2074. [In Persian].
50.  Rafiei, M., Ghaffari, H., & Khorami, M. (2017). Evaluating the Effectiveness of E-Learning Method in Human Resource Education (Case Study of Markazi Province PNU). Research in School and Virtual Learning, 4(16), 71-84. [In Persian].
51.  Rashidi, H., & Movahedin, M. (2020). The Effective Factors Model on Adoption of E-Learning System in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Scince & Technology Parks and Incubators, 16(64), 62-70. [In Persian]. [DOI:10.52547/jstpi.20929.16.64.62]
52.  Rasmussen, J. (2016). E-learning for choral conductors: A study of how e- learning can be used to change the way we teach and learn conducting (Bachelor thesis). Stockholm: Royal College of Music.
53.  Romi, I. (2017). A Model for e-Learning Systems Success: Systems, Determinants, and Performance. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 4- 20. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v12i10.6680]
54.  Sanayei, A., & Salimian, H. (2013). The Analysis of Effecting Factors on Virtual Education Acceptance with Emphasis on Internal Factors. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 7(3), 149-158. doi: 10.22061/tej.2013.151. [In Persian].
55.  Sattari, A., Abdekhoda, M., & Zarea Gavgani, V. (2017). Determinant factors affecting the web-based training acceptance by health students, applying UTAUT model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12(10), 112-126. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v12i10.7258]
56.  Sepasi, S. (2017). The factors affecting the adoption of information technology from the perspective of internal auditors. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 3(4), 189-215. [In Persian].
57.  Sener, J. (2015). Definitions of E-Learning Courses and Programs.
58.  Shami Zanjani, H., Niknami, M., GHourchian, N., & Nohammad Davoudi, A. H. (2018). Providing a Model for Continuing the Use of E-learning in Work Environments (Case study: Headquarters of the State Tax Administration). Iranian Society for Traning and Development, 5(17), 29-53. [In Persian].
59.  Tavallaee, R. (2020). Editorial: The Importance of Knowledge Management for Effective Electronic Learning in the Coronavirus Pandemic. Scientific Journal of Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge, 3(9), 1-4. [In Persian].
60.  Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. [DOI:10.1287/isre.6.2.144]
61.  Tunali, S. (2014). Schools of the future in globalized society: forecasting via scenario development method in Turkish Schools, (dissertation) Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
62.  Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2010). An assessment of customers' E-service quality perception, satisfaction and intention. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 481-492. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.03.005]
63.  Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Janakiraman, S., & Richardson, J. (2017). A team of
64. instructors' use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance
65. strategies: An animal behaviour and welfare MOOC. International Review of Research
66. in Open and Distance Learning, 18(2), 68-90.
67.  Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2006). University Students' Internet Attitudes and Internet SelfEfficacy: A Study at Three Universities in Taiwan. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc, cyberpsychology & behavior, 9(4), 441 -450. [DOI:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.441]
68.  Van Rooj, S. (2011). Instructional design and project management: complimentary or divergent?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 139-158. [DOI:10.1007/s11423-010-9176-z]
69.  Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2015). Virtual interactive e‐learning application: An
70. evaluation of the student satisfaction. Computer Applications in Engineering
71. Education, 23(1), 72-9.
72.  Zamani, B. E., Babri, H., & Mosavi, S. (2012). The Factors Affecting Student's Attitudes toward Learning via Cellular Phone: A Study on Students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Using Technology Acceptance Model. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 9(2), 110-117. [In Persian].
73.  Zamanpour, E., Khani, M., & Moradiani Deizehrud, S. (2013). The effect of Computer Anxiety on Attitude towards E-Learning: The Mediating Role of Attitude and Self-Efficacy of Computer and Internet. Educational Psychology, 9(28), 78-98. [In Persian].
74.  Zareisaroukolaei, M., Shams, G., Rezaeizadeh, M., & ghahremani, M. (2020). Determinants of e-learning effectiveness: A qualitative study on the instructor. Research in Teaching, 8(2), 79-55. doi: [DOI:10.34785/J012.2020.124. [In Persian].]
75.  Zulalie, B., & Ghorbani, F. (2014). Comparison of academic motivation and school engagement in students with and without dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 44-58. doi: 93-3-4-3. [In Persian].
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Razzaghi M, Ghalavandi H, Hasani M. Investigating the Precedents and Consequences of Accepting E-Learning in Students' Educational and Research Goals. MEO. 2022; 11 (2) :157-185
URL: http://journalieaa.ir/article-1-371-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 2 (6-2022) Back to browse issues page
نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان ها Journal of Managing Education in Organizations

 
 
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4447