1. Ahmadi, S., Ahmadi, MS., & Ramazani, A. (2020). Assessing the Education Quality of Faculty Members from Students' Viewpoint at Zanjan Farhangian University. Educational Development of Jundishapur, 11(4), 706_715. [in Persian]. Doi:10.22118/edc.2020.233495.1389 [DOI:10.14807/ijmp.v11i6.1122]

2. Ajam, AA., Jafarithani, H., Mehram, B., & Ahanchian, MR. (2017). Examining the role of students' academic motivation and computer skills in their view of the blended learning approach. New Approaches in Educational Management, 4(3), 63-81. [in Persian]

3. Al-Hatem, A. I., Masood, M., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Fostering Student Nurses' Self-Regulated Learning with the Second Life Environment: An Empirical Study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 285-307. DOI:10.28945/4110 [DOI:10.28945/4110]

4. AlShahrani, F., & Talaue, G. M. (2018). Traditional versus blended learning method: a comparative study on its effectiveness in business communication course. International Journal of Advanced Information Technology, 8(6), 1-18. [DOI:10.5121/ijait.2018.8601]

5. Alshawish, E., El-Banna, M., & Alrimawi, I. (2021). Comparison of Blended Versus Traditional Classrooms among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Nurse Education Today, 106: 105049. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105049]

6. Alvarez, A. G., Dal Sasso, G. T. M., & Iyengar, M. S. (2017). Persuasive technology in teaching acute pain assessment in nursing: Results in learning based on pre and post-testing. Nurse Education Today, 50, 109-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.019 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.019]

7. Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computer Education, 78(1), 227-236. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006]

8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

9. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).

10. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In: Pajares, F. and Urdan, T.S., Eds., Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, Age Information Publishing, Greenwich, 307-337.

11. Bhatti, A., Tubaisahat, A., & El-Qawasmeh, E. (2005). Using Technology-Mediated Learning Environment to Overcome Social and Cultural Limitations in Higher Education. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 2, 67-76. DOI:10.28945/811 [DOI:10.28945/811]

12. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J., & Ciganek, A. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58, 843-855. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010 [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010]

13. Bi, J., Javadi, M. & Izadpanah, S. (2023). The comparison of the effect of two methods of face-to-face and E-learning education on learning, retention, and interest in English language course. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 13737-13762. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-023-11743-3]

14. Blau, G., & Drennan, R. (2017). Exploring differences in business undergraduate perceptions by preferred classroom delivery mode. Online Learning, 21(3), 222-234. [DOI:10.24059/olj.v21i3.973]

15. Blissitt, A. (2016). Blended Learning Versus Traditional Lecture in Introductory Nursing Pathophysiology Courses. The Journal of Nursing Education, 55(4), 227-230. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20160316-09 [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20160316-09]

16. Chandra, V., & Fisher, D. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of a blended web-based learning environment in an Australian High School. In: Fisher, D., Khine, M. S. Contemporary Approaches to Research on Learning Environments: Worldviews, pp. 461-478. DOI:10.1142/9789812774651_0019 [DOI:10.1142/9789812774651_0019]

17. Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In: Khine, M.S., Fisher, D. (Eds.), Technology-rich Learning Environments: A Future Perspective. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 1-20. [DOI:10.1142/9789812564412_0001]

18. Chenari, Z., Rezaei Zadeh, M., Mohammadi Elyasi, G., & Bandali, B. (2020). Identifying and Explaining Ways to Improve the Coaching Process in Managing Organizational Talent. Quarterly Journal of Career & Organizational, 12(45), 177-200. [in Persian]. Doi:10.52547/JCOC.12.4.177 [DOI:10.52547/jcoc.12.4.177]

19. Delaney, D., McManus, L., & Ng, C. (2015). First year accounting students' perception on blended learning. Business Education & Accreditation, 7(2), 9-23. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2730290

20. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018 [DOI:10.1177/0047239520934018]

21. Duque, G., Demontiero, O., Whereat, S., Gunawardene, P., Leung, O., Webster, P., Sardinha, L., Boersma, D., & Sharma, A. (2013). Evaluation of a blended learning model in geriatric medicine: A successful learning experience for medical students. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 32(2), 103-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00620.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00620.x]

22. FathiVajargah, K., Pardakhtchi, MH., & Rabeeyi, M. (2011). Effectiveness Evaluation of Virtual Learning Courses in High Education System of Iran (Case of Ferdowsi University). Information and communication technology in educational sciences, 1(4), 5-21. [in Persian]

23. Gaengler, P., Vries, J., Akota, L., Balciuniene, I., Berthold, P., Gajewska, M., Johnsen, D., Urtane, I., Walsh, L., & Zijlstra, A. (2002). 1.1 Student selection and the influence of their clinical and academic environment on learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 6(3), 8-26. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0579.6.s3.3.x [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0579.6.s3.3.x]

24. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Frameworks, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [DOI:10.1002/9781118269558]

25. Gurchian, N., Jafari, P., & Rahgozar, H. (2009). Designing a model for evaluating the performance of Islamic Azad University units based on organizational excellence indicators using the data coverage analysis method. New Approaches in Educational Management, 2(5), 101-116. [in Persian]

26. Hadjerrouit, S. (2008). Towards a Blended Learning Model for Teaching and Learning Computer Programming: A Case Study. Informatics in Education, 7(2), 181-210. DOI:10.15388/infedu.2008.12 [DOI:10.15388/infedu.2008.12]

27. Hajati, H. (2022). The Effect of ICT in the Curriculum. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1-8. [in Persian]. DOI:10.22034/NAES.2021.272954.1152

28. Hakami, Z. (2021). Comparison between Virtual and Traditional Learning Methods for Orthodontic Knowledge and Skills in Dental Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Healthcare (Basel), 9(9):1092. [DOI:10.3390/healthcare9091092]

29. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the Role of Digital Technologies in Education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(4), 275-285. [DOI:10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004]

30. Hasanah, H., & Malik, M. N. (2020). Blended learning in improving students' critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1295-1306. DOI: 10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5168 [DOI:10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5168]

31. Howard, J., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X.Y., & Ryan, R. (2021). Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis from Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. DOI:10.1177/1745691620966789 [DOI:10.1177/1745691620966789]

32. Hsu, L. L., & Hsieh, S. I. (2014). Factors affecting metacognition of undergraduate nursing students in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(3), 233-241. [DOI:10.1111/ijn.12131]

33. Ibrahim, M. (2018). Blending Mobile Technology into Lecture Delivery: From Theory to Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(36), 157-160.

34. Jarret-Thelwell, F. D., Burke, J. R., Poirier, J. N., & Petrocco-Napuli, K. (2019). A comparison of student performance and satisfaction between a traditional and integrative approach to teaching an introductory radiology course on the extremities. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 33(1), 21-29. [DOI:10.7899/JCE-17-26]

35. Karimimunghi, H., & Mohsenizadeh, SM. (2018). Blended learning and its effectiveness in nursing education: a review. Jundishapur Education Development Journal, 10(1), 29-40. [in Persian]. DOI:10.22118/edc.2019.89145

36. Kayzouri, AH., & Sadeghpour, M. (2017). A Comparison on the Effects of Traditional, E-learning, and Traditional-E learning on the pharmacology course of nursing students. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 24(2), 123-127. [in Persian]

37. Kian, M. (2014). Challenges of Virtual Education: A Report of What Are Not Learned. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 5(3), 11-22. [in Persian]

38. Kim, V. D. L. (2015). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. New directions for higher education, 165, 75-85. DOI:10.1002/he.20085 [DOI:10.1002/he.20085]

39. Kiviniemi, M. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14:47. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-47]

40. Koni, A., Zainal, K., & Ibrahim, M. (2013). An Assessment of the Services Quality of Palestine Higher Education. International Education Studies, 6(2), 33-48. DOI:10.5539/ies.v6n2p33 [DOI:10.5539/ies.v6n2p33]

41. Koper, R., & Tattersall, C. (2005). Learning Design: A Handbook on Modeling and Delivering Networked Education and Training. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, NY, US. [DOI:10.5334/2005-18]

42. Leidl, D., Ritchie, L., & Moslemi, N. (2020). Blended learning in undergraduate nursing education-a scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 86(1), 104318. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104318 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104318]

43. Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1): e2. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4807 [DOI:10.2196/jmir.4807]

44. Madani, R. (2019). Analysis of educational quality, a goal of education for all policy. Higher Education Studies, 9(1), 100-109. DOI:10.5539/hes.v9n1p100 [DOI:10.5539/hes.v9n1p100]

45. Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., Castán, J. M., & Juan, A. A. (2010). How do students measure service quality in e-learning? A case study regarding an internet-based university. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 151-160. http://hdl.handle.net/10609/124046

46. Mcconville, S., & Lane, A. (2006). Using On-Line Video Clips to Enhance Self-Efficacy Toward Dealing with Difficult Situations among Nursing Students. Nurse education today, 26(3), 200-208. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.09.024 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.09.024]

47. McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 225-270. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12509 [DOI:10.1111/jan.12509]

48. Moazami, F., Bahrampour, E., Azar, M. R., Jahedi, Fa, & Moattari, M. (2014). Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Medical Education, 14: 45. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-45 [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-45]

49. Monk, E., Guidry, K. R., Pusecker, K., & Ilvento, T. W. (2020). Blended learning in computing education: It's here but does it work? Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 83-104. DOI:10.1007/s10639-019-09920-4 [DOI:10.1007/s10639-019-09920-4]

50. Moon, H., & Hyun, H. S. (2019). Nursing students' knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 19: 414. DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8 [DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8]

51. Mousa, M. (2017). Technology Based Assessment and Enhancement of Thinking Skills: A Case Study of the Educational System Development in Palestine. International Humanities Studies, 4(2), 22-33. http://ihs-humanities.com/journals/vol4_no2_june2017/3.pdf

52. Najafi, H. (2017). The relationship between dimensions and indicators of combined education and quality of learning in Payam Noor University. Information and communication technology in educational sciences, 7(4), 59-80. [in Persian]

53. Najafi, H. (2019). Comparing of the effect of Blended and Traditional teaching on Learning. Research in Medical Science Education, 11(2), 54-63. [in Persian] [DOI:10.29252/rme.11.2.54]

54. Omrani Saravi, B., & Hemmati, N. (2009). Blended learning. Tehran: Bushra Publications with colleagues of Tohfe Publications. [In Persian]

55. Owston, R., York, D., & Murtha, S. (2013). Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.003]

56. Park, J. Y., Woo, C. H., & Yoo, J. Y. (2016). Effects of Blended Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Defibrillation E-learning on Nursing Students' Self-efficacy, Problem Solving, and Psychomotor Skills. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 34(6), 272-280. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000227 [DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000227]

57. Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1:7. [DOI:10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007]

58. Phakakat, S., & Sovajassatakul, T. (2020). Effects of Copper Model in Blended Service Learning for the Enhancement of Undergraduate Academic Achievements and Critical Thinking. TEM Journal, 9(2), 814-819. DOI: 10.18421/TEM92-52 [DOI:10.18421/TEM92-52]

59. Sabando Barreiro, A. V. (2022). Education 4.0 and its impact on the educational system during the pandemic and post pandemic Covid 19 in Ecuador. Sinergias Educativas, 7(1). [DOI:10.37954/se.v7i1.332]

60. Samaddar, R., & Sikdar, D. D. (2023). Comparison between Activity-Based Learning and Traditional Learning. GPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 17-27. [DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10082367]

61. Schinkel, A., Wolbert, L., Pedersen, J. B., & Ruyter, D. J. (2023). Human Flourishing, Wonder, and Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 42(2), 143-162. [DOI:10.1007/s11217-022-09851-7]

62. Setyaningrum, W. (2019). Self-regulated learning in blended learning approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320: 012089. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012089 [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012089]

63. Shang, F., & Liu, C. Y. (2018). Blended learning in medical physiology improves nursing students' study efficiency. AJP Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 711-717. DOI:10.1152/advan.00021.2018 [DOI:10.1152/advan.00021.2018]

64. Sharafi, S., Sabbagh Hassanzadeh, T., & Zahorparandeh, V. (2019). Examining the features of the combined education curriculum model influenced by the learning theories of three cognitivist, constructivist, and communicator perspectives. The 4th International Conference on Management and Humanistic Science Research in Iran, Tehran. [in Persian]

65. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017]

66. Shirzadegan, R., Mahmoudi, N., Raiesifar, Z., Zargar Shirazi, F., & Taheri, N. (2020). Comparison of three methods of e-Learning, Traditional and Combined Education on the Learning Health Assessment Lesson in Midwifery Students. Journal of Nursing Education, 9(5), 1-10. [in Persian]

67. Shorey, S., Kowitlawakul, Y., Devi, K., Chen, H. C., Soong, A., & Ang, E. (2018). Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 61(3), 120-126. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011]

68. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171. [DOI:10.1177/00472395211047865]

69. Siraj, K. K., & Maskari, A. A. (2019). Student engagement in blended learning instructional design: an analytical study. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 15(2), 61-79. [DOI:10.18538/lthe.v15.n2.283]

70. So, H. J., & Brush, T. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009]

71. Sung, Y., Kwon, I., & Ryu, E. (2008). Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: Integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom. Nurse education today, 28(8), 943-952. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.007]

72. Tan, Y., Yang, J., & Yao, C. (2022). Study on Factors Affecting English Acquisition of Chinese Minority Students Majoring in Nursing in a Blended Learning Environment. Athens Journal of Education, 9(4), 615-640. DOI: 10.30958/aje.9-4-5 [DOI:10.30958/aje.9-4-5]

73. Terry, V., Terry, P., Moloney, C., & Bowtell, L. (2017). Face-to-Face Instruction Combined with Online Resources Improves Retention of Clinical Skills Among Undergraduate Nursing Students. Nurse Education Today, 61(3), 15-19. DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.014]

74. Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8):e16504. [DOI:10.2196/16504]

75. Verkuyl, M., Hughes, M., Tsui, J., Betts, L., St-Amant, O., & Lapum, J. (2017). Virtual Gaming Simulation in Nursing Education: A Focus Group Study. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(5), 274-280. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20170421-04 [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20170421-04]

76. Whitten, P., Ford, D. J., Davis, N., Speicher, R., & Collins, B. (1998). Comparison of face-to-face versus interactive video continuing medical education delivery modalities. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18(2), 93-99. [DOI:10.1002/chp.1340180205]

77. Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (2006). Supervision: a guide to practice. Tehran: Kamaletarbiat. [in Persian]

78. Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities, Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141-2153. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5]

79. Yoon, S. W., & Lim, D. (2007). Strategic Blending: A Conceptual Framework to Improve Learning and Performance. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 475-489.

80. Yu, Z., XU, W., & Sukjairungwattana, P. (2022). Meta-analyses of differences in blended and traditional learning outcomes and students' attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:926947. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926947]

81. Zamani, BI., Babri, H., & Mousavi, S. (2012). Factors related to the attitude of medical students of Isfahan to accept learning through mobile phones using the technology acceptance model. Advances in Medical Education, 9(2), 110-117. [in Persian]

82. Zhu, M., Berri, S. & Zhang, K. (2021). Effective instructional strategies and technology use in blended learning: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 6143-6161 (2021). [DOI:10.1007/s10639-021-10544-w]