[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 4 (12-2024) ::
MEO 2024, 13(4): 91-123 Back to browse issues page
Presenting the model of the future university with a knowledge-enhancing approach
Hamira Amini , Taraneh Enayati * , Kiyomarth Niazaziri
Islamic Azad University, Sari branch
Abstract:   (329 Views)

The purpose of the research was to present the future university model with a knowledge-enhancing approach, the qualitative research method was based on the Grounded theory approach. The participants of the research included professors and managers of higher levels of Azad universities, who were selected as key informants through the purposeful sampling method of 10 people, the estimation of the desired sample size was done based on theoretical data saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The reliability and validity of the data were used through three methods of participant feedback review, Christiansen's angle technique, and external observers. The data were analyzed by open, central and selective coding, the number of 99 open codes (concepts), 19 central codes (dimensions and components) and 6 selective codes (main categories) were counted. The research findings showed that the major and core categories in The format of six dimensions of causal conditions including (structural conditions, cultural conditions, academic processes, characteristics of academic experts), central phenomenon (participatory planning, forward-looking leadership, central issue, academic development), contextual conditions (academic entrepreneurship and increase The economic role of the university, students' participation, free interaction of scientific institutions in the international arena, necessary infrastructure for the development of the future university), intervening conditions (professional management and Laws and regulations of higher education, government credits and financial resources), strategies for reforming the management structure of the higher education system, institutionalization of future research) and consequences (improvement of performance, control of the role of the higher education system) were upgraded to a higher abstract level and finally the research paradigm model Presented.
 

Article number: 4
Keywords: Future University, Knowledge Enhancement, Faculty Member
Full-Text [PDF 706 kb]   (115 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: managing education in higher education
Received: 2024/07/13 | Accepted: 2024/11/15
References
1. Akhavan, P., & Bagheri, R.A.(2018). Knowledge management from idea to practice, Tehran: Ati Nagar publishing house. [in Persian]
2. Ali, F., Nursyamsi, I & Madris, S (2019). The Effect of Visionary Leadership on Study Program Performance in Lldikti IX Sulawesi, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 6(10), 242-248 [DOI:10.22161/ijaers.610.37]
3. Amin Bidokhti, A.A., Rastegar, A.A., & Namani, A.(2015). A future study on higher education approaches in training human capital: A plausible scenario for 2030, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(3): 31-55. [in Persian]
4. Ashilova, M.(2023). The future of the university: four models of development, Journal of Educational Sciences, 76(3): 1-11. [DOI:10.26577/JES.2023.v76.i3.05]
5. Bangani, S.(2018). The History, Deployment, and Future of Institutional Repositories in Public Universities in South Africa, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(1): 95-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2017.12.003]
6. Beheshtirad, R.(2017). Identifying the shaping factors on the future of Iran's higher education quality assurance system in order to provide a favorable scenario, doctoral thesis of educational management, Boali Sina University, Hamedan. [in Persian]
7. Bertaccini, B., Bacci, S., & Petrucci, A.(2020). A graduates ' satisfaction index for the evaluation of the university overall quality, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 73: 1-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.seps.2020.100875]
8. Bikzadeh, S., Yousefi SaeedAbadi, R., Safariyan Hamadini, S.(2020). The role of scientific authority and foresight in the development of fourth generation universities in order to provide a model (case study: Mazandaran Universities of Medical Sciences, Medicine and cultivation, 29(2): 76-87. [in Persian]
9. Brown, M. (2015), June 9th. Opportunities and threats of the MOOC movement for Higher Education: A European perspective.Presentation at How Europe Seizes the Opportunities Offered by MOOCs, HOME Pre Conference Workshop, European Distance and e-Learning Network (EDEN) Conference, Barcelona.
10. Clark, B. (2015).Complexity and Differentiation: The Deepening Problem of University Integration', in D. D. Dill and B. Sporn (eds) Emerging Patterns o Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly, 159-69. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
11. Clarke, J., & Holt, R.(2017). Imagery of ad-venture: Understanding entrepreneurial identity through metaphor and drawing, Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5): 479-497. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.06.001]
12. Eyal, O.(2008). When Parents Choose to Start up a School: A Social-Capital Perspective on Educational Entrepreneurship. Journal of Educational Administration; 46(1): 99-118. [DOI:10.1108/09578230810849835]
13. Ferasatkhah, M.(2013). A Conceptual framework for futurity oriented university planning, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 69, 1-21. [in Persian]
14. Ferasatkhah, M.(2015). The future of internationalization of higher education in the world and how Iranian universities creatively face it, Iran Higher Education Future Research Desk, Institute of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 1-30. [in Persian]
15. Finn, A., Ratcliffe, J., & Lorcan, S. (2007). University futures: The direction, shape and provision of higher education in the university of future. Dublin Institute of Technology, 1- 135.
16. Genza, G. M., & Musisi, B. (2018). Educational Entrepreneurship (EE): Delineating the Domain and Highlighting its Importance and Feasibility in Educational Management in Uganda. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(1):9-17.
17. Gibbons, M .(2012). Globalization and the Future of Higher Education, Globalization: what Issues are at Stake for Universities? Universite Lavel; Quebec Canada.
18. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2013). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. [DOI:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669]
19. Guo, X., Lin, W.,& Zhu, W.(2020). DKEN: Deep knowledge-enhanced network for recommender systems, Information Sciences, 540: 263-277. [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2020.06.041]
20. Hagg, G., &Scholin, T.(2018). The policy influence on the development of Future Leadership in higher education: A Swedish perspective, Education + Training; 60(7): 656-673. [DOI:10.1108/ET-07-2017-0104]
21. Hamilton, S.W. (2008).Who will Save Americs Urban Catholic Schools?, Newyork: Thomas Fordham Institute .
22. Horng, J.S., Liu, C.H., & Huang, Y.C.(2020). The roles of university education in promoting students' passion for learning, knowledge management and entrepreneurialism, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44: 162-170. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.005]
23. Hu, Y.F., Hou, J.L., & Chien, C.F.(2019). A UNISON framework for knowledge management of university-industry collaboration and an illustration, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129: 31-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.072]
24. Huang, W., Mao, Y., & Long, K.(2020). Relation classification via knowledge graph enhanced transformer encoder, Knowledge-Based System, 206: 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106321]
25. Irfan M & Malin M (2012). Building Higher Education Scenarios, 2025: A Strategic Agenda for Higher Education Development in SADC, Sarua Leadership Dialogue series, 3( 2).
26. Islam, N., Afrin, S., Alif, S. K., Hassan, R., Islam, M. M., Kayani, R. E., & Khan, M. M. (2020). Factors Preventing Entrepreneurship: The Case of University Graduates in Bangladesh. World, 11(1): 1-9.
27. Kaplan, A. M. (2012). If you love something, let it go mobile: Mobile marketing and mobile social media 4x4. Business Horizons, 55(2), 129-139. [DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.009]
28. Kateřina, K., & Jana, Š. (2019). Factors A ffecting Entry into Future Leadership for University Students. European Research Studies, 22(4):398-416. [DOI:10.35808/ersj/1517]
29. Khorshidi Hossini, K.(2020). Portraying the future university and introducing the best model for higher education, human resource management doctoral thesis, University of Tehran. [in Persian]
30. Kuttim, M., Kallaste, M., Venesaar, U., & Kiis, A.(2014). Entrepreneurship Education at University Level and Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 11024: 658-668. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.910]
31. Lacatuş, M. L., & Staiculescu, C. (2016). Entrepreneurship in Education. In International conference knowledge-based organization, 22(2): 438-443. [DOI:10.1515/kbo-2016-0075]
32. Levine, M. V. (2009) .The False Promise of the Entrepreneurial University: Selling Academic Commercialism as an Engine of Economic Development in Milwaukee., Working Paper in University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
33. Luo, A., Yang, F., & Cheng, H.(2020). EKENet: Efficient knowledge enhanced network for real-time scene parsing, Pattern Recognition, 111: 107-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107671]
34. Masomifard, M.(2013). Evaluation of quality and quality excellence in virtual universities, PhD thesis on distance education planning, Graduate Education Center. [in Persian]
35. Means, A,J., & Slater, G.(2023).Defending a future university to come, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 45(1): 1-3. [DOI:10.1080/10714413.2023.2174300]
36. Milojević, S. (2014), Augmented reality, the Murabbi and the democratization of higher education: alternative futures of higher education in Malaysia , on the Horizon, 22(2), 110-126. [DOI:10.1108/OTH-08-2013-0029]
37. Mitchell ,D. E. & Nielsen, S.Y . (2012). Internationalization and Globalization in Higher Education, Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/48702. [DOI:10.5772/48702]
38. Mohammadi, R., Fathabadi, J., Yadegarzadeh, Gh,R., Mirza Mohammad, M.H., & Parand, K.(2015). Quality evaluation in higher education, Tehran: Publications of the country's education assessment organization. [in Persian]
39. Montazer, Gh.A., & Falahati, N.(2015). Iraninan Higher Education Future Scenarios Drived by Information Technology, Science and Technology Policy Quarterly, 7(1):66-47. [in Persian]
40. Naghdi, M., Shahtalebi, B., & Nadi, M.A.(2020). Identifying the components of education and human capital development in the transition from traditional university to future university in a mixed method, Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education,26(1): 51-75. [in Persian]
41. Nalda, F.R., Emeterio, M.C., & Arias-Oliva, M.(2022). The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools, Computers in Human Behavior, 112: 106-117.
42. Nurmi, P., & Paasio, K.(2007). Entrepreneurship in Finnish universities, Education + Training; 49(1): 56-65. [DOI:10.1108/00400910710729884]
43. Popescu, F (2015), South African globalization strategies and higher education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 411-418. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.212]
44. Riter, L. (2020). Future Leadership: A Narrative Study Examining Professional Transition Experiences of Educators Who Have Experimented with the Launching of an Educational Activity (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University).
45. Roşca, I.G & Păunescu, C. (2010). Shaping the future of higher education in Romania: challenges and driving factors, Management & Marketing 5( 1), 57-70.
46. Sang, L., Xu, M., & Wu, X.(2020). Knowledge graph enhanced neural collaborative recommendation, Expert Systems with Application, 164: 415-425. [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113992]
47. Schüll, E.(2019). Current trends and future challenges of the Austrian Universities of Applied Sciences, Futures, 111: 130-147. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.015]
48. Shafahi, S., Chenari, A.R., Afkaneh, S.(2023). Investigating the Impact of Future Study Development Indicators of Knowledge Management in Islamic Azad Universities of Tehran Province, Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2): 71-87. [in Persian]
49. SPRING.(2018). Singapore Accreditation Council, Singapore Standards Productivity and Innovation Board.
50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.(2014). The principles of qualitative research method (basic theory; procedures and methods), (Translator: Rahmatullah Rahmatpour), Tehran: Humanities and Cultural Studies Research Institute. [in Persian]
51. Van Damme, D (2020). Trends and Models in International Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Relation to Trade in Education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 4(3): 93-13.
52. Velásquez, R.M., & Lara, J.M.(2021). Knowledge management in two universities before and during the COVID-19 effect in Peru, Technology in Society, 64: 101-123. [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101479]
53. Vitagliano, R., Borasi, R., Jefferson, F., Che, J., & Miller, D. (2008). AERA- Division A: Administration, Organization, and Leadership Entrepreneurial Leadership, Comparing the Practices of an Entrepreneurial Principal and an Education Entrepreneur. Warner School of Education - University of Rochester.
54. Wiseman, A.W.(2014). Internationally Comparative Approaches to Innovation and Future Leadership in Education, in Alexander W. Wiseman (ed.) International Educational Innovation and Public Sector Entrepreneurship (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Volume 23, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.3 - 31 [DOI:10.1108/S1479-3679(2013)0000023009]
55. Xie, X., Zou, H., & Qi, G. (2018). Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in high-tech companies: A multi-mediating analysis. Journal of Business Research, 88, 289-297. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.019]
56. Zareh, H., & Hejazi, S.R.(2011). Designing a performance evaluation system for academic research commercialization, Entrepreneurship Development Quarterly, 3(12): 145-164.
57. Zolfi Gol, M.A.(2004). Migration of Genes, Approach Journal, 34: 22-13. [in Persian]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Amini H, Enayati T, Niazaziri K. Presenting the model of the future university with a knowledge-enhancing approach. MEO 2024; 13 (4) : 4
URL: http://journalieaa.ir/article-1-743-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 4 (12-2024) Back to browse issues page
نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان ها Journal of Managing Education in Organizations

 
 
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710