[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 1 (3-2024) ::
MEO 2024, 13(1): 141-158 Back to browse issues page
Analyzing of Effective Teaching Methods the Field of Educational Administration in Tehran Universities
Khadijeh Mousavi , Fariba Adli , Afsaneh Naraghizadeh , Zeinab Sadeghi *
Assistant Professor of educational management, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (501 Views)
The goal of this research was to identify the components of effective teaching the field of educational administration. The research was conducted using a qualitative method with a Phenomenography approach. Data were collected through triangulation, including: observation of classrooms, a semi-structured interview with 14 professors in the field of educational administration who participated in the research with the intensity sampling method and study syllabus was approved by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. To determine the validity of the data, in addition to the triangulation technique, three curriculum experts checked the data and confirmed their validity. The findings showed that the teaching method of the specialized courses of the master's degree in educational administration is mostly theoretical, not practice-oriented, and the students are not involved in the subject. Effective teaching components were categorized into 7 categories: The importance of teaching educational administration, teaching in the dialogue method in practice, the learner involved in teaching and learning, educational technology as a teaching partner, network-oriented content, the class as a learning cafe and systematic view of teaching components. The findings showed that effective teaching in the field of educational administration requires moving beyond the classroom. Therefore, it is suggested to rewrite the content of the field of educational administration focusing on the presence of students in educational environments.
 
Article number: 6
Keywords: educational administration field, university teaching method, action-oriented learning, discipline-oriented curriculum
Full-Text [PDF 490 kb]   (279 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: managing education in higher education
Received: 2023/10/26 | Accepted: 2024/02/9
References
1. Abdoli, A.; Pourshafi, H.; Zainaldini, H.; Meimand, F. (2016). Examining the teaching situation of lecturers in the higher education system: the need to pay attention to interactive teaching (case study: undergraduate students of South Khorasan Comprehensive Scientific and Applied University), Quarterly Cultural-social studies of Khorasan. 11(3): 47-76. [in Persian]
2. Abdollahi, B.; Ghadimi, F. (2015). Evaluation of the quality of the outputs and consequences of the graduates of the master's degree in educational management. Scientific Research Quarterly of Marine Science Education. 3(5):1-19. [in Persian]
3. Abdullahi, B. Aini, M. Saeedi, Y. (2016). Evaluation of the quality of inputs in the field of educational management in the master's course. Critical research paper of humanities texts and programs. Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 17(6): 217 - 242. [in Persian]
4. Adel Mehrban, M. (2015). An overview of qualitative content analysis and its application in research. Mani. [in Persian]
5. Adli, F. (2019). knowledge transformation and knowledge creation in the organization (moving towards a knowledge-creating university). (2 ed). Jahād-e Dāneshgāhi Tehran. [in Persian]
6. Alaghehband, A. (2016). Theoretical foundations and principles of educational management. (27th ed). Duran Publications. [in Persian]
7. Allio, Robert J. (2005). Leadership development: Teaching versus learning. Management Decision. 7(8):1071-1077. [DOI:10.1108/00251740510610071]
8. Allen,S J.; Rosch, D M.; Riggio, R E. (2021). Advancing Leadership Education and Development: Integrating Adult Learning Theory. Journal of Management Education. 46(2): 252-283. [DOI:10.1177/10525629211008645]
9. Alkan, F. (2016). Experiential Learning: Its Effects on Achievement and Scientific Process Skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 13(2):15-26. DOI: 10.12973/tused.10164a
10. Arefi, M. (2005). Evaluation of the educational science curriculum (educational management orientation) in Iran's higher education from the perspective of students, professionals and employers. Curriculum studies. 1: 43-74. [in Persian]
11. Asadi, M. (2011). Investigating the obstacles to the implementation of active teaching methods by teachers of Payam Noor University in Kerman in the field of educational sciences. Unpublished master's thesis of Allameh Tabatabai University. [in Persian]
12. Babanabadi. F.; Zainabadi, H.; Abdullahi, B. (2017). Evaluation of the quality of a prominent book in the field of educational management from the point of view of graduate students. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Criticism of Humanities Texts and Books.Volume 1, "Professional Experiences of Criticism". [in Persian]
13. Bonaccorsi, A.; Daraio, C. (2007). Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe. Edward Elgar.UK and USA. [DOI:10.4337/9781847206848]
14. Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Quality Measurement and Improvement, 41(5), 545-547. doi:10. 1188/14.ONF.545-547 [DOI:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547]
15. Chen, J. (2007). Teacher's conceptions of excellent teaching in middle school in the North of China. Asia Pacific Education Review. 8: 288-297 [DOI:10.1007/BF03029263]
16. Chiu. M. (2009). Approaches to the Teaching of Creative and Non-Creative Mathematical Problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(1):55-79. DOI:10.1007/s10763-007-9112-9 [DOI:10.1007/s10763-007-9112-9]
17. Dağyar, M.; Demirel, M. (2015). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. 40(181):139-174. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2015.4429 [DOI:10.15390/EB.2015.4429]
18. Dastanpour, T.; Karamalian, H.; Sarmadi, M.; Faraj Elahi, M. (2016). Examining the compatibility of the elements of the undergraduate curriculum of the e-learning system with the teachings of the constructivist approach from the point of view of professors and students of Payam Noor University. Research in curriculum planning. 14(55):100-110. [in Persian]
19. Devlin, M.; Samarawickrema, G. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development. 29(2):111-124. [DOI:10.1080/07294360903244398]
20. Dyck, B. (2017). Reflecting on 25 Years of Teaching, Researching, and Textbook Writing for Introduction to Management: An Essay with Some Lessons Learned. Journal of Management Education. 41(6):817-834. [DOI:10.1177/1052562917693381]
21. Eghbali, A.; Salehi, A. Ghaedi, Y.; Mahmoudni, A. (2021). A reflection on the basic features of emancipatory classroom components in higher education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 27(1):27-50. [in Persian]
22. Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). (Kindle, Ed.) London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
23. Hasan, T.; Bani, I A.; Ageely, H.; Fauzi, M. (2011). An Ideal Medical Teacher. Education in Medicine Journal. 3 (1):54-59. 10.5959/eimj.3.1.2011.spc1 [DOI:10.5959/eimj.3.1.2011.spc1]
24. Hashemzadeh Aghdam, N.; Behrangi, M. (2022). Managing an Effective Model (MEM) of teaching and learning on student's professional ethics and job resilience of NAJA Staff in Kurdistan Provincial Police University of Applied Sciences. Journal of Managing Education in Organizations.Volume 11, Issue 4: 135-156. Doi. 10. 52547 /MEO.11. 4 .135 [in Persian] [DOI:10.52547/meo.11.4.135]
25. HosseinNejad, G.; Akash, S. (2012). Investigating the utilization of active teaching methods by university professors. The specialized scientific quarterly of police knowledge of the capital police. 6(2). [in Persian]
26. Hosseinzadeh, K.; Sarchemi, R.; Moradabadi, H., Arbab Kazemzadeh, M. (2017). Students' participation in teaching from the perspective of faculty members: a qualitative study. Development strategies in medical education. 5(1): 42-53. [in Persian]
27. McIntyre, Michael L.; Murphy, Steven A. (2016). The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Industry & Higher Education.30 (2):109-116. [DOI:10.5367/ihe.2016.0300]
28. Mard, M.; Zainabadi, H.; Arasteh, H. (2016). Indicators of a successful educational leader; Findings of a phenomenological study (scientific article of the Ministry of Science). School management. 5 (2):109-128. [in Persian]
29. Marsh, C J. (2009). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. (4th ed). Routledge [DOI:10.4324/9780203870457]
30. Mehrmohammadi, M. (2019). Rethinking the process of teaching, learning and teacher training. (3 th ed). Monadi tarbiat. [in Persian]
31. Mirkamali, M. (2013). Leadership and Educational Management. (17th ed). Yastarun. [in Persian]
32. Mirkamali, M.; Karamati, M.; Arefi, M.; Mokhtarian, F. (2017). A qualitative study of the expected learning achievements of the master's course in educational management from the perspective of educational management experts and employers. Research in educational systems. (12):131-153. [in Persian]
33. Mohammadi, B. (2012, autumn and winter). Observation unit in qualitative research. Iranian Anthropology Research Journal. 3(2):145-162. [in Persian]
34. Mohammadpour, A. (2010). Anti-Methodology: Logic and Design in Qualitative Methodology. Volume 1. Tehran: Jamaehshnasan.
35. Mohammadpour, A. (2012). Anti-Method of Qualitative Research.Volume I: Logic and Design in Qualitative Methodology. Tehran: Jamaehshnasan.
36. Najjar Lashgari, S.; Khalkhali, A.; Zarei, H.; Pali, S. (2022). Structural Analysis of Scientific Productions in the Field of Educational Management in Iran. Managing Education in Organizations. Vol.10/No. 4:117 -140. Doi.10. 52547/MEO.10. 4 .117. [in Persian] [DOI:10.52547/meo.10.4.117]
37. Nelson, A F. (2017). Constructivist Instructional Practices and Teacher Beliefs Related to Secondary Science Teaching and Learning. ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, College of Saint Elizabeth. Non-Journal.
38. Noorabadi, S.; Ahmadi, P.; Dabiri Esfahani, E.; Farastkhah, M. (2013). The necessity and possibility of changing the curriculum approved by Iran's higher education system to a unified curriculum (case study: educational management orientation, undergraduate course). Education Quarterly and evaluation.7(25):101-122. [in Persian]
39. Pusser, B.; Kempner, K.; Marginson, S.; Ordorika, I. (2012). Universities and the Public Sphere: Knowledge Creation and State Building in the Era of Globalization. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203847848]
40. RahimiMand, M.; Abbaspour, A. (2015). The relationship between teaching methods (group discussion, question and answer, scientific demonstration and lecture) with students' motivation to progress. Educational Psychology (Psychology and Educational Sciences).12 (39):1-24. [in Persian]
41. Reimers, F M. (2020). Educating Students to Improve the World. Springer [DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-3887-2]
42. Seldin, P. (2006). Evaluating college teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning.(33): 47 - 56. DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219883306 [DOI:10.1002/tl.37219883306]
43. Shirbagi, N.; Kaveh, S. (2011). Investigating the supervisory role and relationship between the supervisor and the student from the point of view of the master's degree students. New educational approaches. 7(1):1-26. [in Persian]
44. Sontag, M. (2009). A Learning Theory for 21st-Century Students. Journal of Online Education. 5(4).
45. Stephanie, A.; Welcomer, S A.; Haggerty, M E. Sama, L M. (2021). Management Education in a "Post-Truth" World: Critical Theory's Contribution to Addressing Disruptions to Learning and Communication. Journal of Management Education. 46 (2): 284-312. [DOI:10.1177/10525629211008644]
46. Talebzadeh Shoushtri, L.; Khamsan, A.; Pourshafi, H. (2016). The documents of the successful professors in effective teaching based on the foundational theory method. Journal of New thoughts on Education.13(3):211-228. DOI:10.22051/JONTOE.2017.7898.1112. [in Persian]
47. Taufigian, T.; Menadi, H.; Nasrallahi, S.; Rakhshani, M. (2014). Prioritizing effective teaching indicators; Comparing the views of students and professors of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. Education strategies in medical sciences. 8(1):1-6. [in Persian]
48. Theeke, M.; Hall, M I. (2021). Cocurricular Learning in Management Education: Lessons from Legal Education's Use of Student-Edited Journals. Journal of Management Education. 46(3): 558-581. [DOI:10.1177/10525629211014240]
49. Tondeur, J.; Braak, J.; Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education. British Journal of Educational Technology. 38(6):962 - 976. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00680. x [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00680.x]
50. Yacoubi, M.; Romania, S. (2012). The teacher's role as a manager of curriculum change. Conference of the Iranian Curriculum Studies Association. Course 12. [in Persian]
51. Zhao, C.; Golde, C M.; McCormick, A C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behavior affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 31(3):263-281. DOI: 10.1080/03098770701424983. [in Persian] [DOI:10.1080/03098770701424983]
52. (2015). Keeping it on the company campus. The Economist. 16th May. Retrieved March, 2017. from http://www.economist.com.
53. (2021). Master of Educational Management Syllabus Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. [in Persian]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mousavi K, Adli F, Naraghizadeh A, Sadeghi Z. Analyzing of Effective Teaching Methods the Field of Educational Administration in Tehran Universities. MEO 2024; 13 (1) : 6
URL: http://journalieaa.ir/article-1-653-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 1 (3-2024) Back to browse issues page
نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان ها Journal of Managing Education in Organizations

 
 
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 35 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660