[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 10, Issue 3 (11-2021) ::
MEO 2021, 10(3): 79-103 Back to browse issues page
Analysis of Lean Management Components in Education – A Qualitative research method based on grounded theory
Moharamali Hashemi , Jahangir Yari haj atalou * , Sadegh Malekiavarsin
Abstract:   (1963 Views)
The purpose of this study was to analyze the components of lean management and develop an appropriate model of lean management for Iran’s educational system. In this research, a qualitative research method based on grounded theory with Strauss-Corbin model was used and semi-structured interviews with 11 elites were continued by purposeful sampling method until theoretical saturation was achieved. To ensure the validity of the instrument, expert review and to ensure the reliability of the data, the non-participating elite review method was used.The results of data analysis around the paradigm model in 37 Components including: causal causes, 7 Components (introduction and promotion of pure methods, role of experts,…), environmental conditions, 8 Components (position of local educational leaders, compliance with laws and policy makers,…) Context factors, 9 Components (capacity of laws and regulations, compliance The main body of the system,…) strategies, 6 Components (re-engineering in education economics, professional selection,…) and consequences, 7 Components (education excellence, stakeholder satisfaction,…). After analyzing the data, "value creation through identifying and eliminating maximum losses" was identified as the main phenomenon.
Keywords: Lean management model, education, value creation, waste
Full-Text [PDF 3338 kb]   (674 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: managing education in education
Received: 2021/06/20 | Accepted: 2021/10/9 | Published: 2021/11/1
References
1. Alagaraja, M. and S. Thompson (2006). A Review of Lean Principles as Applied to the Education Environment. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference.
2. Alp, N. (2001). The lean transformation model for the education system. 29th Computers and Industrial Engineering Conference, Montréal.
3. Antony, J., et al. (2012). Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. [DOI:10.1108/17410401211277165]
4. Antony, J., et al. (2015). A comparative study of Lean implementation in higher and further education institutions in the UK. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
5. Antony, J., et al. (2015). Waste identification and elimination in HEIs: the role of Lean thinking. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
6. Balzer William, K., et al. (2015). Lean higher education: successes, challenges, and realizing potential. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32(9): 924-933. [DOI:10.1108/IJQRM-08-2014-0119]
7. Balzer, W. K., et al. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. [DOI:10.1108/QAE-03-2015-0011]
8. Cano, M. and E. O'NEILL (2014). Lean Manufacturing: Can it be Applied Successfully within the Higher Education Sector? The International Conference" Quality and Dependability".
9. Cano, M., et al. (2016). A framework for implementing Lean operations management in the higher education sector. Toulon-Verona Conference" Excellence in Services".
10. Deshpande, M. (2020). Lean Model of Quality Management in Higher Education. Quality Management Implementation in Higher Education: Practices, Models, and Case Studies, IGI Global: 153-173. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-9829-9.ch008]
11. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781529716641]
12. Ghavidel, Azam (2016). Lean management and its application in the world of education. Journal of Inclusive Management. 1, 1 (52-61). [in persian]
13. Gholami, somayeh., Et al. (2020). Identifying the factors affecting the difference between continuous and final grade scores in the 11th grade from the perspective of teachers and students: a mixed research study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies 9 (28 # p00936):.[ Text in Persian]
14. Gholami, somayeh., Et al. (2020). Identifying the factors affecting the difference between continuous and final grade scores in the 11th grade from the perspective of teachers and students: a mixed research study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies 9 (28 # p00936):.[ in Persian]
15. Grudowski, P. and M. Wiśniewska (2019). Lean management in higher education institutions. How to begin? Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska: 49-61. [DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2019.137.4]
16. Höfer, S. and J. Naeve (2017). The application of lean management in higher education.
17. Hooshisadast, A., et al. (2018). Designing a lean university model for public universities (Case study: Farhangian Teacher Education University (FTEU)). Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 11(3): 132-141]in Persian]
18. Iman, Mohammad taghi (2013). Methodology of Qualitative Researches, Qom, Research Hozeh and University.[ in Persian]
19. Isaksson, R., et al. (2013). Lean higher education and lean research. 16th Toulon-Verona Conference; Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia; 29-30 August 2013.
20. Jafari, Parivash, Yazdani, Sohrab. (2008). Six Sigma and Lean Management Approaches in Education. Scientific Journal of Education and Evaluation (Quarterly), 1 (3), 7-40.[ in Persian]
21. Jahangiri, Abbas.(2016) Cases and extent of application of lean management techniques and tools in the Iranian health care system. Health Information Management, [S.l.], p. 681-704, [in Persian]
22. Jedynak, P. (2015). Lean management implementation: Determinant factors and experience. Jagiellonian Journal of Management 1(1): 51-64.
23. Kamkar, Zohreh, Abdollahi, Bijan, Zeinabadi, Hassan Reza, Abbasian, Hossein. (2019). Provide an integrated model of pure professional learning communities in school. Journal of School Administration, 7 (1), 147-162. [in Persian]
24. Kamp, P. (2017). The Lean Journey for Dutch Higher Education Institutions: a way to go?, University of Twente.
25. Kedem, Y. (2013). A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR APPLYING LEAN MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. .
26. Lahidji, B. and W. Tucker (2015). Lean Thinking in Higher Education: Using the Push-Pull Model for Online Graduate Courses Serving Mid-Career Professionals. Toulon-Verona Conference" Excellence in Services".
27. Martínez Sanahuja, S. (2020). Towards Lean Teaching: Non-Value-Added Issues in Education. Education Sciences 10(6): 160. [DOI:10.3390/educsci10060160]
28. Novak, S. (2005). The small manufacturer's toolkit: a guide to selecting the techniques and systems to help you win, CRC Pr [DOI:10.4324/9780203338353]
29. Odero, E. (2017). Lean thinking, value-creation processes, leadership, organizational culture and performance of universities: a conceptual analysis. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 3(4): 353-386.
30. Pusca, D. and D. O. Northwood (2016). Can lean principles be applied to course design in engineering education? Global Journal of Engineering Education 18(3): 173-179.
31. Salimi, Qasim, Keshavarzi, Fahimeh, Heidari, Elham. (2015). Experimental study of the relationship between psychological empowerment and maturity of behavior of Shiraz Bargh students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 5 (19), 1-22.[ in Persian]
32. Singh, J. (2020). Applying lean methodology to curriculum revision and internship placement process-a case study. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. . [DOI:10.1108/JRIT-05-2019-0055]
33. Stone, K. B. (2012). Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. [DOI:10.1108/20401461211243702]
34. Thirkell, E. and I. Ashman (2014). Lean towards learning: connecting Lean Thinking and human resource management in UK higher education. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25(21): 2957-2977. [DOI:10.1080/09585192.2014.948901]
35. Government Of The Islamic Republic of Iran (2020). www.dolat.ir/detail/332424 (99/06/26)
36. Isna (2019). www.isna.ir/news/07909 (98/01/21)
37. Isna (2020). www.isna.ir/news/21525 (99/05/2)
38. Ziskovsky, B. and J. Ziskovsky (2019). Optimizing Student Learning: A Lean Systems Approach to Improving K-12 Education, CRC Press. [DOI:10.4324/9780429447976]
39. Zivkosky, B. and J. Zivkosky (2007). Applying process improvement to K-12 education . Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Education.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

hashemi M, yari haj atalou J, malekiavarsin S. Analysis of Lean Management Components in Education – A Qualitative research method based on grounded theory. MEO 2021; 10 (3) :79-103
URL: http://journalieaa.ir/article-1-304-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 3 (11-2021) Back to browse issues page
نشریه مدیریت بر آموزش سازمان ها Journal of Managing Education in Organizations

 
 
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660